Friday, February 26, 2010

Stop Potential BSE (Mad Cow) Beef Imports to Australia Petition

On 20 October 2009, the Australian Government announced a change in Australia’s BSE (Mad Cow) food safety policy for imported beef and beef products.

This means from the 1st March 2010 beef imports will be allowed from countries with a history of mad cow disease which clearly pose potential health risks unless strictly managed before they are sent to Australia.

AUSBUY urges you to sign this petition to strictly regulate the importation of Beef from countries which have proven outbreaks of Mad Cow Diesease "BSE".


We have higher quality management standards than imported countries. All Australian beef is tagged from birth allowing high quality control through the whole food chain. A steak in New York can be readily traced back to the farm in Toowoomba. We need to ensure that these strict rules under which our beef producers operate are the minimum standards for imports. BSE has a long gestation period and this needs to be taken into consideration. It will be too late if BSE is identified here. The whole of our beef industry will be shut down including our exports, which have already suffered with our high dollar. There is no guarantee that this will not get into the Australian food chain and infect our animals and our people. In addition, our farmers will lose a local market to supply our pies.

Trade is meant to be a service, not be the economy. Australians want to buy Australian food not foreign food, but despite AUSBUY'S submission to the Senate Inquiry into Truth in Labelling in late 2009 we are still denied the truth about the country of origin of foods on our labels. AUSBUY's research indicates consumers want to know the Country of Origin of their food. Country of origin should be indicated on all processed and fresh foods not just the name of the country in which the food in processed but the source of all ingredients 


Stop Potential BSE (Mad Cow) Beef Imports to Australia Petition

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

'How Bad For The Environment Can Throwing Away One Plastic Bottle Be?

Although this article reflects on American's habits and lifestyle - can you see yourself in this story? Habits can be broken - but only when we think about what happens as a result of our actions.

....According to the inner monologue of millions upon millions of citizens, while not necessarily ideal, throwing away one empty bottle probably wouldn't make that much of a difference, and could even be forgiven, considering how long they had been carrying it around with them, the time that could be saved by just tossing it out right here, and the fact that they had bicycled to work once last July.

In addition, pretty much the entire states of Missouri and New Mexico calmly reassured themselves Monday that they definitely knew better than to do something like this, but admitted that hey, nobody is perfect, and at least they weren't still using those horrible aerosol cans, or just throwing garbage directly on the ground.

All agreed that disposing of what would eventually amount to 50 tons of thermoplastic polymer resin wasn't the end of the world....
Read the whole article at link below

Women value rivers more

This research was conducted in Victoria. Would those same values be held by people in South East Queensland where our local Logan River rated F for fail on the latest Healthy Waterways Report Card?

Charles Sturt University (CSU) research shows that women place a much higher value on the environmental and social values of rivers than men.

Men value rivers more for their economic importance says PhD student with CSU’s Institute for Land, Water and Society, Ms Eloise Seymour.

Last year Ms Seymour surveyed more than 500 people in central Victoria including those living in and around Maryborough, Castlemaine, Guildford and Newstead; those working in natural resource management (NRM); and members of Field Naturalists groups.

Her survey, which aimed to determine how different groups within the community value different natural assets, focused on three such assets in the region: the Moorlort Wetlands, Box Ironbark Forest and the Loddon River.

“Environmental agencies usually rely on scientists and technical experts for guidance regarding the value of certain natural places,” Ms Seymour said. “However, understanding how community values natural areas can help reduce conflict over how they are managed and by whom. I also wanted to find out whether people’s general values about the environment and the world might influence their conservation behaviour or the types of values they assign to specific places.”

“I found that females placed a much higher importance on the environmental (habitat for fish and threatened species) and social (peaceful, attractive, a place where people can gather) values of the river than males did,” Ms Seymour said. “Men, on the other hand, placed a higher importance on the economic (place for grazing stock alongside, irrigation) value of the river. But, as can be expected, the Field Naturalists place a higher importance on the environmental value of the river than anything else.”

Another finding was that professional people and retirees valued the river for its environmental value more so than farmers.

“While farmers did place high importance on the environmental value of the river, it wasn’t as high as professional people and retirees,” said Ms Seymour. “Farmers placed a higher importance on the economic value of the river compared to professionals, retirees and people working in Natural Resource Management.”

Ms Seymour said she found a “bit of a difference” between the values of farmers and people working in NRM. “The people working in NRM placed far more importance on the environmental values than farmers and scored the economic values much lower,” she said.

“Retirees just liked to know the river exists. They like it because it’s a peaceful place and for other social values such as it being an attractive place and somewhere to go to study nature.”

Ms Seymour found that growing up next to the river made no difference to the values people placed on it. “However it did make a difference with how people valued the Box Ironbark Forest,” she said.

“If they spent their childhood in Melbourne or a big city like that, they placed much more importance on the environmental and social values of the forest than people who grew up in small country towns or on farms.”

Ms Seymour also found that people who lived closer to the river assigned more importance to economic values and as a peaceful place where people could gather.

“The further away people lived from the river, the more they placed importance on its environmental value,” she said.

Other findings were:

•People who had lived in an area for a long time placed higher importance on the river for its economic value and for fishing

•Newer residents placed more importance on environmental values

•People who lived on small properties valued the river for its habitat, its historical value and just the fact it existed more so than those who lived on large properties

Ms Seymour, who research has been funded by the Future Farm Industries Cooperative Research Centre, has almost completed her three year project.

“My last bit of analysis will look at what role values have in predicting people’s environmental behaviour, as I also surveyed landholders as to whether or not they had revegetated river frontage or fenced off areas,” she said.

Ms Seymour will run a series of talks in the district to present her findings to the communities she surveyed.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Civic leaders want accurate forecasts to manage population growth | The Courier-Mail

Civic leaders want accurate forecasts to manage population growth The Courier-Mail

Go Green Toolshed » Blog Archive » The big squeezy: PM’s population plan questioned

GOGREENTOOLSHED report on recent forum

South-East Queensland civic leaders have called for a national framework to assist states and local councils to reach sustainable population targets.

Speaking at a Brisbane Institute population growth seminar last night, Brisbane’s Lord Mayor Campbell Newman said there needed to be more federal involvement in the future growth of the state’s south-east corner.
He also questioned the validity of the ‘Big Australia’ proposal, where the national population will grow to 35 million by the middle of this century.
”We need a national population policy,” Cr Newman said. ”We need actually to develop some idea of how this is going to be carved up and how every state can attract some of these people.”
.....
Sunshine Coast mayor Bob Abbot – a vocal critic of over-population – agreed the federal government needed to provide more information about the benefits of Big Australia.
....
Ms Bligh warned against ‘’simplistic solutions”, such as banning further residential development in urban areas, which could result in higher house prices.

Cr Newman said the mix of housing types in the South East Queensland Regional Plan needed reviewing.
“For every 100 families that come to the region, there will be an appetite for a certain number of detached homes and an appetite for a certain number of apartment or infill dwellings,” he said.

“I think we should be looking at the issue of [undeveloped] land supply,” he said. He said Brisbane’s nearby rural Scenic Rim, Lockyer and Somerset councils offered the best opportunity for sustainable population growth.
....
Delfin representative Guy Gibson said there needed to be more emphasis on building detached housing in the suburbs, which he described as half the cost of inner-city apartments. He also criticised the assumption units were more popular.
However Bob Abbot rejected Mr Gibson’s call for extra land to be made available, saying developers were already “sitting” on 150,000 blocks.

Read whole post - The big squeezy: PM’s population plan questioned
at following link
 
Go Green Toolshed » Blog Archive » The big squeezy: PM’s population plan questioned

Friday, February 19, 2010

Aquaponics info from Faith and Sustainable Technology

Aquaponics is the integration of aquaculture (fishkeeping) and hydroponic (soilless) plant growth techniques. It requires no soil and no chemicals to produce a vast and large amount of fish, fruits and vegetables in a very small space. Fish produce amonia as waste. Bacteria convert that waste to nitrates used by the plants as the nutrient source. The water is recirculated to the fish clean and aerated. Water consumption is lower and plant density is usually at least twice that of soil based methods. No pesticides can be used as they would kill bacteria and fish in the system. Food produced is thereby pesticide free.
Travis Hughey is the inventer of the Barrel-Ponics method of aquaponics and the author of The Barrel-Ponics Manual which is available as a free download from the website at the following link.



Faith and Sustainable Technology - Technology

Amy Bauman is greening the construction industry, one steel I-beam at a time | Grist

GreenGoat began to quell Amy Bauman's personal frustration with waste levels in the construction industry. She was really upset seeing things being tossed into dumpsters with no apparent concern for reuse potential. Today, her company stems the tide of waste by offering common-sense approaches to reuse and recycling plans. The name came from the goat’s proclivity for eating just about everything in sight.
Read the interview in Grist's Placemakers series at following link.
Is this something we can all take on board in our daily lives and places of work?
Amy Bauman is greening the construction industry, one steel I-beam at a time Grist

India bans GE eggplant - Monsanto 'fakes' safety data True Food Guide l

In Australia we need to be asking more questions and expect that our elected representatives ie our government provide the answers.

The Indian Government has banned genetically engineered (GE) eggplant after the ex-Director of Monsanto India admitted the corporation provided 'fake scientific data' to regulators.

In announcing the moratorium on GE eggplant, Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, said there was not enough evidence that GE foods were safe to eat and that they didn't harm the environment.

“It is my duty to adopt a cautious precautionary principle-based approach and impose a moratorium on the release of Bt-Brinjal until such time as independent scientific studies establish, to the satisfaction of both the public and professionals, the safety of the product from the point of view of its long-term impact on human health and the environment,” said Ramesh.

The decision followed a public statement from former Director of Monsanto India, Tiruvadi Jagadisan. In his statement, Jagadisan said that the chemical company "used to fake scientific data" to get government regulatory agencies to approve GE crops for commercial release.

The Indian Government decision has implications for Australia, raising serious questions about the safety of the GE foods that have been approved for Australians to eat.

"India's GE outrage calls into question the credibility of all food safety data provided by Monsanto," said Greenpeace GE campaigner, Laura Kelly. "Greenpeace is calling on the federal government to act immediately to review the regulations that allow our regulator to disregard independent evidence on the risks Australians face eating GE foods and consider only the data provided by multinational chemical companies with a history of illegal activity," says Kelly.

"The same gene inserted into GE eggplant has been inserted into the GE cotton grown in Australia in NSW and Queensland," says Kelly. "This is used to produce cottonseed oil, which is a popular frying oil in fast-food restaurants."

"The Indian Government's rejection of this GE toxin raises the urgent need for the Australian Government to improve current food safety regulations and consider all independent, peer-reviewed studies on the health risks of eating GE toxins in food."

Read more here True Food Guide Email

Friday, February 12, 2010

Microbats — Gosford City Council

Microbats  Microchiropteran Bats

 
Bats are an important component of Australia's fauna, constituting about 30% of our native mammal species. All bats are grouped into the Order Chiroptera (Bats). They are divided into two main groups; Megachiropterans (flying foxes/fruit Bats) and Microchiropterans (mainly small insectivorous bats).1

At dusk various species of micro-bats can be observed flying over or around eucalypt canopies or throughout the edges or tracks of bushland areas. These small bats display a rapid, jerky almost haphazard flight while foraging for flying insects from dusk throughout the night. Specialist methods of surveys using electronic call detection recorders and harp traps or mist nests are required to identify what species are found at particular sites.

Threats to Survival


 
  • Disturbance to colonies, roost sites and maternity caves.
  • Predation by feral cats.
  • Clearing and fragmentation of habitat.
  • Removal of tree hollows.
  • Competition for tree hollows by Common Myna.
  • Use of pesticides.
  • Fire.
  • Reduction in stream water flows quality and quantity.

 
Management Issues

 
Protection and improvement of roosting habitat, including hollows, caves and dense foliage.

 
Retention or establishment of regional and local corridors for foraging, breeding and roosting in the semi-urban to urban landscape.

 
Erection of roost boxes in suitable habitat.

 
Creekline revegetation to provide suitable foraging habitat near waterways.
 
Microbats — Gosford City Council is the source document

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Cost of housing and cost of dependency in Australia | (We) can do better

Housing affordability and availability is at critical levels as the gap between the 'haves' and 'have nots' grows wider. In Logan we have a ludicrous situation where our elected representatives have been influenced by the 'haves' who did not wish to have the 'have nots' living in their precinct in low cost recovered housing that complied with all standards,   A small business wanted to provide shelter for some citizens with some hardships - but council - urged by some community - say no - or not here?

The blog by Sheila Newman posted at http://www.candobetter.org/ helps to balance the message regularly dispensed by 'big' developers and the need for ever more land.

Cost of housing and cost of dependency in Australia (We) can do better

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

LGAQ's Greg Hallam Concerned Over Scheme For Building Duplexes

Councils forced to take developers 'on trust': LGAQ reports TONY MOORE in Brisbane Times today.
South-East Queensland councils will have to take developers "on trust" for the State Government's new tick-the-box planning scheme to introduce thousands of new duplexes in the region.


Local Government Association of Queensland executive director Greg Hallam said the organisation was aware of community concerns about the plan, which was announced by Planning Minister Stirling Hinchliffe on Tuesday.

However, Mr Hallam said the LGAQ would accept the changes because of the pressure to find extra homes needed for the rising population in Queensland's south-east corner.

Under the new plan, "low impact" duplex developments - where two homes were built on one residential block - a developer could self assess their project against 22 categories.

Mr Hallam said if developers ticked all 22 boxes, the application would not need go back to council for approval.

"So we are basically being asked to take this on trust," he said.
Read full report at link following.


LGAQ's Greg Hallam Concerned Over Scheme For Building Duplexes

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Book Review: Slow Death by Rubber Duck – Generation Green

We are all surrounded by toxins in our environment and many of us sail through life blissfully unaware - until it impacts on us personally - that not everything that is sanctioned by our governments and man-made for profit is in the best interests of humanity.

Read about the unseen dangers - and what you - we all - can do to live in a safer world.

What started out as a funny joke and dare between friends actually became an amazing project that will empower consumers. Two Canadian environmentalists exposed themselves to everyday products and watched the toxin levels in their body’s skyrocket. Sadly, this experiment is something most of us do unknowingly every day. The authors show how our everyday exposures and product choices impact our toxin levels and health risks. Although I am still shocked by how common the toxins are, I was very encouraged to learn that many of them will leave the body in just a few days after reducing the exposure.


Despite the light title, this book is packed with intelligent insights, is backed by research and is fascinating to read. It will help you take actions that will measurably reduce your exposure to harmful toxins. Congratulations to the authors for turning this heavy topic around and pointing to a more positive and hopeful approach that is within our control. More at following link.

  Book Review: Slow Death by Rubber Duck – Generation Green

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Bio-diverse-city - explore the way humans can build resilient cities now and into the future

Why 'Bio-diverse-city' ? There is an obvious play around the word 'biodiversity' of course. Beyond that, hyphenating the components of the title implies a deconstruction into individual parts that nevertheless still belong to the whole. Thus 'bio' might suggest the natural world, or 'organic' rather than 'mechanical', while 'diverse' suggests a spread of characteristics and increased complexity. The city is the preferred ecological niche now for Homo sapiens and inevitably will be where much of the focus is directed for planning human futures in the face of great environmental change. Fusing the ideas of biodiversity and the city reflects a growing world view of the importance of containing one within the other in planning.
Local artist Barry Fitzpatrick has collboratively worked with other artists to produce this exhibition which is to be feaured at Sunshine Coast Regional Council's Treeline Project. In 2009 the exhibition was held in Logan City. See link following for more details.

Bio-diverse-city